New Laker Noise, Same Old Laker Problems – Lakernoise

New Laker Noise, Same Old Laker Problems

Tags: , , , , ,

There’s much consternation in Lakersville these days. A lot of it centers on the team’s iffy defense.

Assistant coach Kurt Rambis is the team’s defensive coordinator, so to speak. Yes, the Lakers do trap a bit, but that’s kind of the window dressing of what they do.

Their basic problem defines what Rambis has chosen to do on defense. Phil Jackson’s teams have always struggled with small, quick guards that break down the bigger guards that Jackson likes to use. This type of penetration has proven deadly for the Lakers in particular. So Rambis has basically chosen to pack in the defense and concede the open three-pointer.

One Laker insider says Jackson has chosen to give Rambis this much power because he wants to help him get a head coaching job. Yikes. He may not be doing Rambis any favors. At times the Lakers D looks to be a jumbled mess. Other times, it works well enough. After all, they have jumped out of the gate with better than 20 wins. 

But everyone involved senses problems, including Jackson’s fine coaching staff (Rambis, Frank Hamblen, Brian Shaw, Jim Cleamons, and several others). These coaches are not all on the same page about this defensive philosophy, but Rambis is calling the shots. So pack it in they do. 

Years ago, Bulls GM Jerry Krause first hired Phil Jackson and declared that he was a “defensive genius.” Krause repeated that assessment earlier this year. But he was wrong back then and he was wrong again recently.

Phil Jackson is no defensive genius. In fact, he became enchanted with the triangle offense years ago and began directing most of his coaching energy to that end of the floor. Jackson still does that, and he has done it with substantial success. Jackson has felt comfortable turning the defensive issues over to Rambis. To Kurt’s credit, the Lakers surprised some teams early with their trapping and steals. But teams have adjusted, and the Lakers still have their same old problems.

The Lakers are a team sorely in need of a defensive overhaul and some new defensive life, which means they’ll probably have to make some personnel changes to achieve it. Kobe Bryant is still an excellent on-ball defender. The problem comes when he’s playing off the ball. Bryant has a tendency to gamble off his man and leave him open to do major damage when Bryant’s gambles don’t work, which is often.

The Lakers need to rethink their defensive philosophy and come up with something that gives them a reasonable chance to defend. For starters, they need to re-establish tough man-to-man principles, get back to the basics, so to speak. If they don’t do that, it won’t matter how dominant they are in the Western Conference. If they’re lucky enough to return to the league championship series, they’ll once again find a Rajon Rondo and others breaking them down, with Celtics shooters killing them with open threes, just as Eddie House, James Posey, Ray Allen and Paul Pierce did last year.

Good basic man defense is the first step in the Lakers getting the mental toughness they need to compete for a title. Fortunately, there’s some basketball left to be played. But this is an issue that has to be addressed now. Revising your philosophy is something you can’t do in March and April.

NEW BLOG DESIGN

Those of you who used to read Lakernoise will notice that I have a new blog design. This new lease on life is due to the hard efforts of Andrew Mager and  Marc ( http://twitter.com/marcm ). They’ve done a great job coming up with the new look.

I still write the blog for hoopshype.com

You can find it at http://blogs.hoopshype.com/blogs/lazenby/index.php

2 Comments

  1. PL
    Posted December 23, 2008 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the post Roland, I love to read your insights.

    What I’m trying to figure out – is it the scheme not working or are the players not implementing it good enough to make it work?

    Or a combination of both? From my view it looks like they have a plan, but not everybody on the floor is on the same page of that plan at all times. How many times have we seen a Laker guarding a guy with the ball, shade a certain way expecting help from that direction only to have the guy blow by them with no help in sight? Seems like 3 times a game! I don’t get it.

  2. Pinky
    Posted December 23, 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Good to see you’re back in the Lakers blogosphere, Professor!

Post a Comment

*
*